Home
RECENT NEWS
Thank you, Madam Chairwoman. Welcome, Secretary Mayorkas. I sincerely thank you for joining us today.
Continuing the dialogue that we had on a bipartisan basis before the Easter break will be important in the weeks to come.
I am hopeful you can provide some additional insight into the plan that you released yesterday afternoon that outlines six border security pillars to address the historic number of migrants encountered by our agents and officers.
The crisis border continues to dominate the headlines, in part because of the administration's plans to repeal Title 42 – which have now fortunately been blocked by court order, at least temporarily.
Roughly half of all migrants your agents and officers encounter illegally crossing the border are subject to removal under the Title 42 authority.
If that tool goes away, it has the potential to profoundly impact border security operations.
I want to thank the chairwoman for holding this important hearing on the Department of Homeland Security's fiscal year 2023 budget.
Thank you also, Secretary Mayorkas for joining us. We look forward to your testimony today.
First, I want to honor Texas National Guardsman Bishop Evans.
Specialist Evans lost his life over the weekend saving two migrants from drowning.
Our deepest condolences go out to the family and friends of Specialist Evans, as well as the Texas National Guard.
Illegal crossings, like the one Specialist Evans encountered, have skyrocketed under this administration.
A record number of migrants attempted to cross the border illegally last year, and we are on track for another record-breaking year.
On average, our Border Patrol Agents encounter seven thousand individuals every day. This is straining the capabilities of our processing and detention facilities.
Mister Speaker, I rise today in support of H.R. 2471, a bill that will provide funding for the Federal Government through the end of this fiscal year.
While it has taken us far too long to get here, I am glad we were able to produce a bill that includes many funding priorities that I support.
Since last summer, I have made it clear that House Republicans wouldn't oppose appropriations bills unless they:
- Increase defense spending,
- Restrain non-defense spending,
- Include all long-standing policy provisions, and
- Do not include any poison pill riders.
After months of negotiations, we reached a deal that meets all four of these criteria.
The bill before us:
